Details

Published: 15 February 2022

Hits: 1992

• That children have to grow up in homes with parental alcohol problems is an invisible and silent crisis worldwide.* As their parents cannot provide shelter and often basic support, also society is failing to protect and promote the rights of these children.
• In the United States, more than 10% of children live with a parent with alcohol problems.
• In the EU, 9 million children grow up with parents who have alcohol problems.
• There are 2.6 million children of school age living with parental alcohol problems in the UK alone.
• In Australia 1 million children live in households with at least one adult being addicted.
• The number of children living in homes that are ravaged by alcohol problems sky-rockets considering the countries around the world that are currently not even measuring the issue
• Negative impacts on children due to parents’ alcohol use are of epidemic proportions and a real crisis. All available evidence shows that the problem is massive:*
• In the United States, mothers convicted of child abuse are 3 times more likely to be alcoholics and fathers are 10 times more likely to be alcoholics.
• More than 50% of all confirmed abuse reports and 75% of child deaths involve the use of alcohol or other drugs by a parent.
• USA: 13% of child abusers are under the influence of alcohol.
• Europe: 16% of all cases of child abuse and neglect are alcohol-related.
• Alcohol is a major factor in domestic violence. Children are more likely to develop aggressive tendencies where there is a lack of parental monitoring, or where parents provide aggressive role models.
• Alcohol fuels and exacerbates child maltreatment, and physical and sexual abuse
• Children were 52% more likely to have anxiety or depression when both parents regularly consumed alcohol.
• Children of Alcoholics…

• Don’t Trust
• Don’t Talk
• Don’t Feel (National Association of Children of Alcoholics)

For complete research go to Children of Alcohol-Facts-and-explanation (movendi.ngo)

Details

Published: 23 December 2021

Hits: 1606

(Dalgarno Institute continues to lobby for the following interventions, as it has done so in both NSW and Victoria in the past year)

Dozens of health experts are pushing to ban booze deliveries to homes after 10pm following an increase in alcohol-related deaths during lockdowns.

Australian Bureau of Statistics data revealing an eight per cent jump in alcohol-related deaths during 2020. Professor Rosemary Calder from Victoria University’s Mitchell Institute and AHPC said banning late night home booze deliveries was needed to save lives and cut rising rates of chronic illness linked to risky drinking.

Statistics revealed an eight per cent jump in alcohol-related deaths during 2020.

“The potential for unrestricted access to alcohol, late night trading and late night deliveries in particular, are likely to literally fuel risk risks to vulnerable people, whether it’s from intoxication, overconsumption of alcohol or violence,” Prof Calder said.

The AHPC push is being backed by health and policy experts from across Australia’s universities and research centres, recommending restricted late night supply of alcohol, banning booze sales after 3am and only allowing home delivery to between 10am and 10pm.

“We have seen a big jump in both men and women dying from an alcohol-induced illness such as poisoning or liver disease, however even relatively limited alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of many chronic illnesses, including breast and other cancers, heart disease, stroke, dementia, depression and anxiety,” Professor Calder said.

For more

Details

Published: 17 December 2021

Hits: 1665

While many Australians enjoy pleasures associated with drinking alcohol, we need to treat it with more caution, with alcohol consumption conservatively estimated to cost the Australian community $66.8 billion a year in health, workplace and other costs, according to research released today. This dollar figure covers some significant personal and community level harms.

Examining the Social and Economic Costs of Alcohol Use in Australia: 2017/18, published by the National Drug Research Institute (NDRI) at Curtin University in Perth, is the first national update in a decade of the costs of alcohol use. Using up-to-date methods of calculating costs and including a number of previously uncounted conditions and costs, it is substantially higher than the 2010 estimate of $14.4 billion. The main estimate includes some reference to ‘protective’ effects from alcohol, consistent with the evidence. A conservative estimate was made in our calculation of costs, as further harms where a reliable cost could not be estimated were excluded.

The research behind the updated national estimate was funded by the Australian Government Department of Health, and found that in the 2017-2018 financial year:

• alcohol was responsible for $18.2 billion in tangible costs including from: ill health; health service costs such as emergency department and hospital admissions; worker absence and occupational injuries; crime; road traffic crashes; and, alcohol purchases by those dependent on alcohol (but not by other alcohol consumers);
• alcohol was responsible for another $48.6 billion in intangible costs, which is the value of items that can’t be bought or sold, such as years of life lost from premature death, lost quality of life from living with alcohol dependence or from child abuse, and, impacts on victims of alcohol-caused crime; and,
• not included in the overall total were costs such as those associated with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder ($16 billion). There is a clear need for evidence about the prevalence of FASD to allow an accurate estimate of cost and to inform preventive and other responses.

There were several other critical areas where, due to limited data, reliable cost estimates were difficult to determine including: lost quality of life from living with someone with alcohol dependence; and, reduced workplace productivity (‘presenteeism’). Although not included in the overall total, indicative estimates suggested that these outcomes were highly likely to attract substantial costs.

“Alcohol continues to cause a significant toll through premature deaths, with 5,219 cases attributed to alcohol in 2017/18, personal suffering, reduced quality of life, and real financial costs in Australia,” Professor Allsop said.

“Nearly half-a-million Australians are dependent on alcohol, with many more drinking in a way that puts their health at risk. Importantly, any member of the community can be impacted by the drinking of others. The many adverse health effects and other consequences result in significant costs to society. Effective strategies to address alcohol related harms have the potential to substantially reduce medical costs, improve productivity, diminish crime, and lower costs to the whole community while improving community and individual wellbeing.”

 For more details

Details

Published: 16 September 2021

Hits: 1900

ABSTRACT

Background: Reducing the alcohol-attributable cancer burden in the WHO European Region is a public health priority. This study aims to estimate the number of potentially avoidable cancers in countries of the WHO European Region in 2019 for three scenarios in which current excise duties on alcoholic beverages were increased by 20%, 50%, or 100%.

Methods: Mean prices and excise duties for beer, wine, and spirits in the Member States of the WHO European Region in 2020 were used as the baseline scenario. We assumed that increases in excise duties (20%, 50%, and 100%) were fully incorporated into the consumer price. Beverage-specific price elasticities of demand, with lower elasticities for heavy drinkers, were obtained from a meta-analysis. Model estimates were applied to alcohol exposure data for 2009 and cancer incidence and mortality rates for 2019, assuming a 10-year lag time between alcohol intake and cancer development and mortality.

Findings: Of 180,887 (95% Confidence interval [CI]: 160,595-201,705) new alcohol-attributable cancer cases and 85,130 (95% CI: 74,920-95,523) deaths in the WHO European Region in 2019, 5•9% (95% CI: 5•6-6•4) and 5•7% (95% CI: 5•4-6•1), respectively, could have been avoided by increasing excise duties by 100%. According to our model, alcohol-attributable female breast cancer and colorectal cancer contributed most to the avoidable cases and deaths.

Interpretation: Doubling current alcohol excise duties could avoid just under 6% (or 180,900 cases and 85,100 deaths) of new alcohol-attributable cancers within the WHO European Region, particularly in Member States of the European Union where excise duties are in many cases very low.

For complete research