Details

Published: 10 September 2025

Hits: 34

As Alcoholics Anonymous celebrates its 90th anniversary this year, questions surrounding the effectiveness of AA continue to shape discussions about alcohol recovery methods. Since its founding in Ohio in 1935, the fellowship has grown into a worldwide movement with millions of active members, yet its approach remains both influential and controversial in modern addiction treatment.

The Foundation of Alcoholics Anonymous

Alcoholics Anonymous operates on the principle that members must self-identify as “alcoholics” and commit to total abstinence from alcohol. The programme centres around the famous 12 steps, which guide participants through a journey of acceptance and personal transformation. All meetings are guided by AA’s 12 traditions and texts such as the “Big Book”, encouraging self-awareness, spiritual growth, and connection with fellow members.

The fundamental anonymity principle that defines AA makes it impossible to quantify exact recovery rates, creating ongoing debates about the effectiveness of AA in scientific and medical communities.

Contrasting Approaches: Alcoholism vs Alcohol Use Disorder

One of the most significant tensions surrounding Alcoholics Anonymous relates to how it conceptualises drinking problems. AA’s approach treats “alcoholism” as a lifelong condition affecting people who are categorically different from other drinkers. As the Big Book states, “the delusion that we are like other people, or presently may be, has to be smashed.”

This perspective contrasts sharply with contemporary scientific understanding. Modern medical classifications use terms like “alcohol use disorder,” recognising drinking problems as existing on a continuum rather than as distinct categories. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) distinguishes between mild, moderate, and severe alcohol use disorders, acknowledging that many people with drinking issues fall far from traditional “alcoholic” stereotypes.

The Powerlessness Principle and Its Implications

Central to Alcoholics Anonymous is the first step: “We admitted we were powerless over alcohol — that our lives had become unmanageable.” This concept of powerlessness defines AA’s approach but conflicts with contemporary addiction science, which recognises that control over alcohol consumption can vary significantly depending on context, environment, and circumstances.

Modern treatment approaches, particularly motivational interviewing, regard ambivalence about change as normal rather than viewing reluctance to accept powerlessness as “denial.” This represents a fundamental difference in how the effectiveness of AA is measured against evidence-based therapeutic interventions.

The Abstinence Debate

Perhaps the most contentious aspect of Alcoholics Anonymous is its unwavering commitment to total abstinence. Whilst lifelong sobriety remains AA’s cornerstone, decades of research demonstrate that many people achieve recovery through controlled drinking approaches. This evidence challenges the universal applicability of AA’s methods and raises questions about the effectiveness of AA for individuals with less severe drinking problems.

Studies consistently show that controlled drinking can be a viable outcome for many people, particularly those with milder alcohol use disorders. However, widespread scepticism towards this approach persists, largely attributed to the long-standing dominance of “alcoholism” models promoted by organisations like Alcoholics Anonymous.

Identity and Stigma: The Double-Edged Sword

The requirement for members to identify as “alcoholics” creates complex dynamics around stigma and self-perception. Whilst some AA members successfully challenge stigma by fostering an “alcoholic identity” as a mark of strength and recovery commitment, this experience isn’t universal. Research indicates that mandatory self-labelling can become a barrier for some individuals, questioning the effectiveness of AA for diverse populations.

The broader concern relates to people who may never consider themselves “alcoholics” despite having significant drinking problems. This particularly affects individuals whose alcohol use doesn’t match common stereotypes of “alcoholism,” potentially preventing them from recognising problems or seeking appropriate help.

Scientific Evidence on Alcoholics Anonymous Effectiveness

The most comprehensive analysis of Alcoholics Anonymous came from a 2020 Cochrane review examining 27 studies involving 10,565 participants. The review compared 12-step facilitation treatment and AA engagement against other therapeutic approaches, finding that AA “may be at least as effective as other treatments” for most outcomes.

Notably, the review found that 12-step facilitation was associated with higher rates of continuous abstinence (periods of uninterrupted sobriety). However, this didn’t necessarily translate to more total abstinent days over 12-month follow-up periods, raising questions about the effectiveness of AA beyond its primary abstinence-focused metrics.

Critics, including addiction researchers Stanton Peele and Professor Nick Heather, challenged both the study’s limitations and interpretations. They suggested that the focus on continuous abstinence might be problematic, potentially contributing to the “abstinence violation effect,” where belief in necessary total abstinence can trigger heavier drinking following any alcohol consumption.

How Alcoholics Anonymous Works When It Does

Research into the mechanisms behind Alcoholics Anonymous success identifies several factors that align with broader recovery principles. These include the development of recovery capital through social, personal, and cultural resources, which enhance motivation and self-efficacy whilst forming new social networks and recovery-focused identity.

Alcoholics Anonymous effectively helps members transition from social networks that may have facilitated drinking to ones explicitly focused on sobriety. The fellowship provides meaning and purpose conducive to psychological wellbeing, with some members benefiting specifically from spirituality-based aspects of the programme.

Social network transformation represents a critical factor in recovery success, and Alcoholics Anonymous membership offers one pathway to achieve this, though not the only one.

Modern Challenges and Limitations

Ninety years on, Alcoholics Anonymous remains a dominant force in recovery landscapes, significantly shaping public understanding of alcohol problems through its “alcoholism” paradigm. However, its approach clearly isn’t suitable for everyone, particularly those with less severe issues, individuals uninterested in abstinence, or those uncomfortable with spiritual elements or self-labelling requirements.

The effectiveness of AA becomes questionable when considering the broader spectrum of alcohol problems. Many heavy drinkers use “alcoholism” stereotypes to contrast against their own drinking patterns, potentially preventing problem recognition through a process called “othering.”

Future Considerations

Questions arise about whether Alcoholics Anonymous bears responsibility for considering these broader implications. AA’s tenth tradition states: “Alcoholics Anonymous has no opinion on outside issues; hence the AA name ought never be drawn into public controversy.” This suggests that responsibility for addressing limitations of “alcoholism” models may lie with professionals, policymakers, and media rather than AA itself.

Alcoholics Anonymous highlights one valuable recovery route for a subset of people experiencing alcohol-related harm, but alternatives are essential. Alcohol problems extend well beyond those fitting within the “alcoholism” paradigm, requiring diverse approaches to meet varied needs.

Conclusion

As Alcoholics Anonymous marks its 90th anniversary, its influence on addiction recovery remains undeniable. Whilst research supports the effectiveness of AA for many members, particularly in achieving continuous abstinence, significant questions remain about its universal applicability.

The tension between AA’s “alcoholism” model and contemporary alcohol use disorder concepts reflects broader challenges in addiction treatment. Recognising these limitations shouldn’t be considered criticism of Alcoholics Anonymous but acknowledgement that comprehensive alcohol problem addressing requires multiple approaches.

For individuals whose needs align with AA’s philosophy and methods, the fellowship continues providing valuable support and community. However, expanding understanding of recovery options ensures that people across the spectrum of alcohol problems can access appropriate, evidence-based support tailored to their specific circumstances and goals. (Source: WRD NEWS)

Details

Published: 05 September 2025

Hits: 32

The opioid crisis continues to devastate communities across Canada and beyond, with recent research highlighting alarming treatment retention failures that underscore why prevention must be our primary defence. A comprehensive study examining opioid agonist therapy amongst First Nations people in Ontario reveals shocking statistics that every family, educator, and community leader must understand.

The Stark Reality of Opioid Addiction Treatment

New research tracking nearly 18,000 treatment episodes reveals a disturbing truth: prevention is worth a pound of cure when it comes to opioid addiction. The study found that:

• Half of all individuals discontinued their life-saving medication within just 42-71 days
• Over 70% of people failed to maintain treatment for a full year
• Treatment success rates have actually declined over time

These statistics aren’t just numbers—they represent thousands of lives disrupted, families torn apart, and communities struggling with addiction’s devastating impact.

Why Opioid Addiction Prevention Must Be Our Priority

The research demonstrates that even with the best medical interventions available, maintaining recovery from opioid addiction remains extraordinarily challenging. This reality makes opioid addiction prevention absolutely crucial for protecting our young people and communities.

The Treatment Retention Crisis

The study revealed several factors that made treatment failure more likely:

• Living with multiple health conditions
• Previous exposure to opioids
• Social isolation and lack of community support
• Geographic barriers to accessing ongoing care

These findings highlight how complex opioid addiction becomes once established, reinforcing why we must focus our efforts on stopping addiction before it starts.

Building Strong Opioid Addiction Prevention Strategies

Effective prevention requires understanding the pathways that lead to opioid addiction and implementing comprehensive strategies to block them:

Education and Awareness

• Comprehensive drug education programmes in schools
• Community awareness campaigns about prescription opioid risks
• Training for healthcare providers on responsible prescribing practices

Community-Based Prevention

• Youth engagement programmes that provide positive alternatives
• Family support networks that identify risk factors early
• Workplace education about opioid misuse dangers

Policy and Environmental Changes

• Stricter controls on opioid prescribing and monitoring
• Enhanced security measures for prescription medications
• Community policies that reduce access to illegal opioids

The Economic and Social Case for Prevention:

The research findings make a compelling economic argument for investing in opioid addiction prevention rather than treatment alone. When treatment success rates remain disappointingly low despite significant healthcare investment, prevention becomes not just morally imperative but financially prudent.

Communities that invest in robust prevention programmes see:

• Reduced healthcare costs over time
• Lower crime rates associated with drug-seeking behaviour
• Stronger family units and social cohesion
• Better educational and employment outcomes for young people

A Prevention-First Approach:

The sobering treatment retention statistics from this research should serve as a wake-up call for policymakers, educators, and community leaders. We cannot afford to wait until addiction has taken hold—we must act decisively to prevent it.

Prevention is worth a pound of cure, and when it comes to opioid addiction, this couldn’t be more true. Every young person we protect from initial opioid exposure is a life potentially saved from the devastating cycle of addiction and treatment failure.

The time for action is now. We must strengthen our prevention efforts, support our communities, and ensure that prevention remains our primary defence against the ongoing opioid crisis.

(Source: JAMA Network)

Details

Published: 13 August 2025

Hits: 76

Nearly 80 per cent of South Australians back proposed South Australia alcohol reforms designed to reduce family violence and protect vulnerable communities from escalating alcohol-related harm.

Strong Public Mandate for Legislative Change

Polling commissioned by the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education (FARE) reveals overwhelming public support for stronger regulations on alcohol sales and home delivery services. The comprehensive survey reinforces calls for the South Australian Government to prioritise community safety through decisive legislative action.

Furthermore, the data demonstrates that residents want robust measures to regulate online alcohol sales and home delivery systems. Consequently, this public sentiment strengthens the case for implementing the proposed Liquor Licensing (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 2025.

Clear Community Priorities Emerge

The polling data reveals compelling statistics about public attitudes towards alcohol harm prevention measures:

• 77.4 per cent believe government should prioritise harm reduction over alcohol industry profits when drafting liquor legislation
• More than two-thirds (68.8 per cent) support limiting alcohol home delivery to between 10am and 10pm as a violence prevention measure
• Almost three-quarters (73.5 per cent) endorse a mandatory two-hour safety pause between online alcohol orders and home delivery

Expert Commentary on Reform Necessity

FARE CEO Ayla Chorley emphasised the critical nature of these proposed changes. “Here is a clear example where government can make simple changes to keep women and children safe,” she stated. Moreover, the polling demonstrates that South Australians want their government to implement these essential South Australia alcohol reforms to reduce alcohol-related harm.

Additionally, Chorley highlighted the groundbreaking nature of the proposed legislation. “The proposed legislation is the first of its kind in Australia and an opportunity for the South Australian Government to lead the way in reducing gendered violence,” she explained.

Evidence-Based Approach to Public Safety

The draft legislation incorporates several evidence-based alcohol harm prevention measures, including:

• Implementation of a two-hour mandatory safety pause between ordering and delivery
• Restricting delivery times to 10.00am – 10.00pm daily
• Establishing harm reduction as the paramount objective in liquor legislation

Importantly, these reforms follow National Cabinet’s response to the Rapid Review of Prevention Approaches to End Gender-Based Violence. The review specifically identified alcohol as a key factor in escalating domestic and family violence incidents.

National Leadership Opportunity

All First Ministers have agreed to review state and territory liquor laws to prioritise violence prevention against women and children. Therefore, South Australia has the opportunity to lead national efforts in implementing meaningful legislative change.

The proliferation of largely unregulated online alcohol sales and rapid delivery services has significantly amplified harm risks. Consequently, South Australia alcohol reforms represent a crucial step towards addressing these emerging challenges.

Compelling Statistical Evidence

The urgency of reform becomes clear when examining domestic violence statistics. Alcohol involvement appears in one in three intimate partner violence incidents and one in four family violence incidents. These figures underscore the critical importance of implementing comprehensive alcohol harm prevention measures.

“We can’t wait any longer for meaningful legislative change to protect women and children in our community,” Chorley emphasised. Additionally, she acknowledged potential industry resistance whilst expressing optimism about government action.

Research Methodology and Credibility

The polling research was conducted online by Pure Profile between 9 and 22 May 2025. The study surveyed 1,013 people aged over 18 residing throughout metropolitan and regional South Australia. Importantly, the sample maintains representativeness across age, gender, and location demographics.

Future Impact and Implementation

Chorley expressed confidence that strong public support will galvanise government action on liquor law changes. “Passing these laws will set the standard for jurisdictions right across Australia and make a real difference in the lives of countless women and children,” she concluded.

The proposed South Australia alcohol reforms represent a significant opportunity to establish national leadership in violence prevention whilst protecting vulnerable community members from escalating alcohol-related harm.

(Source: WRDNews)

Details

Published: 13 August 2025

Hits: 95

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s World Drug Report 2025 delivers a The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime’s World Drug Report 2025 delivers a sobering wake-up call for Australia’s drug prevention crisis. Meanwhile, whilst policymakers debate harm reduction strategies and law enforcement approaches, the nation is haemorrhaging lives and resources to preventable drug-related harm. Moreover, the data reveals we’re not just losing the war on drugs – we’re actively retreating from the battlefield where victory is most achievable: prevention and recovery.

Furthermore, Australia’s drug prevention crisis has reached critical levels, with our position as a global outlier in drug consumption alarming every parent, educator, and community leader. However, this isn’t just about statistics – it’s about the devastating reality that our current approach is failing the very people we’re meant to protect.

Australia: A Global Leader in Drug Consumption

The World Drug Report 2025 places Australia in an uncomfortable spotlight as a world leader in several disturbing categories. Specifically, against a global backdrop of 316 million people using drugs in 2023 – with cannabis dominating at 244 million users, followed by opioids (61 million), amphetamines (31 million), cocaine (25 million), and “ecstasy” (21 million) – Australia’s consumption rates are alarmingly disproportionate.

Cocaine Crisis: First, Australia holds the unwelcome distinction of having the highest past-year cocaine use globally in the Australia and New Zealand subregion. Nevertheless, the report notes that whilst consumption based on wastewater analysis is “clearly lower than in other parts of the world,” suggesting most users are occasional rather than regular consumers, this pattern actually masks a more insidious problem – widespread experimentation that can rapidly escalate to dependency.

“Ecstasy” Epidemic: Even more concerning is Australia’s status as having “by far the highest” global prevalence of “ecstasy” use worldwide. Indeed, this statistic exemplifies the Australia drug prevention crisis – it represents hundreds of thousands of Australians, many of them young people, exposing themselves to substances with unpredictable purity and potentially fatal consequences.

Cannabis Concerns: Similarly, cannabis use remains “significantly higher than the global average, with prevalence of use exceeding 12 per cent” in Australia and New Zealand. Particularly troubling, amongst school students aged 15-16, the prevalence sits at 13 per cent, compared to the global average of just 4.4 per cent. Additionally, this occurs in a global context where cannabis accounts for 244 million users worldwide – making it the most widely used illicit substance globally.

The Treatment Gap: A System in Crisis

Perhaps most damning is the treatment data. Globally, only 64 million people with drug use disorders received treatment in 2023 – a mere 8.1% of the population needing help, with stark gender disparities (1 in 18 women versus 1 in 7 men accessing treatment). Consequently, against this global treatment crisis, Australia’s specific failures become even more stark.

Importantly, the report reveals that over 40 per cent of those in drug-related treatment in Australia and New Zealand are being treated for methamphetamine use disorder – the highest proportion globally. Furthermore, adding to this concerning picture, Oceania leads the world with 35% of people in drug treatment being women, compared to just 32% in the Americas, 20% in Europe, 13% in Africa, and only 8% in Asia. Therefore, this statistic exposes two critical failures:

1. Prevention Failure: Clearly, the sheer volume of people requiring methamphetamine treatment indicates our prevention efforts have been woefully inadequate.
2. Recovery Gap: Meanwhile, whilst we’re treating people after they’ve developed severe dependencies, we’re missing countless opportunities for early intervention and prevention.

Subsequently, the report notes that people in drug-related treatment in Australia and New Zealand are “relatively young, in particular in Australia, where 55 per cent are under the age of 35.” Consequently, this demographic should be our biggest red flag – the Australia drug prevention crisis is losing an entire generation to preventable drug harm. Significantly, Australia and New Zealand rank amongst the highest for young people in treatment at 25%, exceeded only by regions facing severe socioeconomic crises like South America (50%) and conflict-affected areas such as the Near and Middle East (35%).

The Methamphetamine Reality Check

The World Drug Report provides a stark assessment of Australia’s methamphetamine situation:

• Whilst “annual methamphetamine use has been decreasing in the general population,” conversely, amongst people who inject drugs, “consumption has become more intensive, causing greater harm.”
• Similarly, New Zealand monitoring programmes have detected “sharply increasing levels of methamphetamine in wastewater, especially in the second half of 2024.”

Ultimately, this data reveals the hollowness of celebrating reduced overall usage when the most vulnerable populations are experiencing intensified harm. Indeed, it’s like celebrating fewer house fires whilst watching the remaining blazes burn hotter and more destructively.

The Pacific Gateway Problem

Australia’s geographic position has made it a magnet for international trafficking networks operating in a global context of unprecedented drug production. Specifically, with global cocaine manufacture reaching a record high of 3,708 tons of pure cocaine in 2023 – a staggering 34% increase from the previous year – Australia has become a prime destination market.

Additionally, the report notes that “the Pacific islands are increasingly targeted as transit points for cocaine and methamphetamine primarily destined for Australia and New Zealand.” Consequently, this means our drug problems aren’t just domestic – we’re becoming a destination market that’s corrupting entire regional trafficking networks, whilst global drug seizures show cocaine (2,275 tons), cannabis herb (5,749 tons), and methamphetamine (482 tons) flooding international markets.

The Criminal Justice Reality

Australia’s drug prevention crisis extends into our criminal justice system, where we’re following global patterns that prioritise punishment over prevention. Specifically, worldwide, 6.1 million people had formal contact with police for drug-related criminal offences in 2023, with approximately two-thirds (66%) involving drug possession or use rather than trafficking.

Furthermore, in Oceania specifically, 73% of people in formal contact with police were there for drug possession/use offences – amongst the highest globally and significantly above the trafficking-focused patterns seen in regions like Africa (32% possession) or Asia (33% possession). Therefore, this data reinforces that our criminal justice response continues to target users rather than addressing the underlying prevention failures that create demand in the first place.

Where We’re Dropping the Ball in Australia’s Drug Prevention Crisis

1. Prevention Investment

Obviously, the Australia drug prevention crisis is fundamentally a resource allocation problem. Although the report doesn’t provide specific prevention spending data for Australia, the treatment statistics tell the story. Clearly, with over 40% of people in treatment dealing with methamphetamine disorders and such high prevalence rates for cocaine and “ecstasy,” our prevention efforts are clearly insufficient.

2. Early Intervention

Similarly, the high percentage of young people in treatment (55% under 35) indicates we’re missing critical intervention windows. Unfortunately, by the time someone enters treatment, prevention has already failed.

3. School-Based Prevention

Particularly concerning, with 13% of Australian school students aged 15-16 using cannabis (triple the global average), our school-based drug education and prevention programmes are demonstrably inadequate. Undoubtedly, this educational failure sits at the heart of Australia’s drug prevention crisis.

4. Community-Based Prevention

Furthermore, the casual acceptance of “ecstasy” use (evidenced by our world-leading consumption rates) suggests community-wide normalisation of drug use that effective prevention programmes should be addressing. Notably, in a global context where only 21 million people used “ecstasy”-type substances in 2023, Australia’s disproportionate consumption indicates a fundamental cultural shift that prevention efforts have failed to address.

The Path Forward: Solving Australia’s Drug Prevention Crisis

Fortunately, the World Drug Report 2025 offers crucial guidance that Australia must heed to address this drug prevention crisis:

Evidence-Based Prevention: Importantly, the report emphasises that “evidence-based prevention programmes at the policy and legislative levels are effective in preventing drug use, as well as many other risky behaviours.” Consequently, to overcome Australia’s drug prevention crisis, the nation needs to dramatically increase investment in these programmes.

Youth-Focused Approaches: Additionally, prevention systems should “support the healthy and safe development of children and youth through family skills, socio-emotional learning and opportunities to lead healthy lifestyles.”

Integrated Healthcare: Furthermore, the report recommends “integrating drug use disorder treatment and care into existing healthcare systems” to improve quality, effectiveness, and efficiency.

Recovery Support: Finally, long-term recovery must be supported through measures that address not just addiction but the underlying social and economic factors that contribute to drug use.

The Cost of Inaction

Undoubtedly, every day we delay implementing comprehensive prevention and recovery programmes, more young Australians will join the statistics in the next World Drug Report. Indeed, the current approach – reactive treatment after severe dependency has developed – is not just more expensive but fundamentally less effective than prevention.

Ultimately, the report’s data on treatment demographics should serve as a final wake-up call: when 55% of people in treatment are under 35, and when we lead the world in “ecstasy” use and rank amongst the highest for cocaine use, we’re not dealing with a fringe problem affecting a small minority. Therefore, Australia’s drug prevention crisis demands mainstream solutions for what has become a mainstream problem.

A Call to Action

Clearly, Australia stands at a crossroads. Essentially, we can continue our current trajectory – leading the world in drug consumption whilst playing catch-up with treatment services – or we can pivot towards the prevention and recovery approaches that the evidence shows actually work.

Obviously, the choice is clear, and the time for action is now. Ultimately, our young people, our communities, and our future depend on getting this right. Moreover, the World Drug Report 2025 has shown us where we stand globally. Therefore, the question is: what are we going to do about it?

Finally, the data doesn’t lie, and neither should we about the urgency of addressing Australia’s drug prevention crisis. Consequently, prevention and recovery aren’t just policy options – they’re moral imperatives for a nation that claims to care about its future. (Source: UNODC)