- Details
- Hits: 807
A comprehensive study involving data from 63 studies and nearly 440,000 youths has indicated a significant association between marijuana use and poor academic outcomes among teenagers. According to the research, teens who use cannabis are more likely to experience lower school grades, a reduced likelihood of completing high school, and decreased chances of enrolling in or graduating from university. The study, published in JAMA Pediatrics, also notes that chronic marijuana use during adolescence can lead to long-term changes in brain architecture, impairing cognitive and memory functions. This analysis provides “moderate-certainty” evidence linking adolescent cannabis use to a 39% higher probability of lower grades and more than double the odds of school dropout and absenteeism.
The findings underscore the urgent need for effective interventions to prevent early cannabis exposure, as public acceptance of marijuana grows alongside its legalisation. The study further highlights that more than 3 million U.S. youths aged 12 to 17 have used cannabis in the past year, a figure that surpasses the usage rates of other illicit drugs. Despite the compelling data, researchers note that the study does not definitively prove causation, as factors like mental health issues may predispose some teens to both cannabis use and academic struggles. However, the results emphasise the critical nature of addressing marijuana use during adolescence to mitigate its potential impact on educational attainment.
- Details
- Hits: 658
Growing Concerns Over Cannabis Use
As more jurisdictions move towards legalising cannabis for both medical and recreational purposes, the perception of its risks has notably diminished. However, recent studies suggest that users may need to reassess these risks, particularly concerning cardiovascular health. Dr. Angelos Katramados, a neurologist and director of the acute stroke unit at Henry Ford Health, underscores the urgency for comprehensive research into the implications of cannabis use on stroke risk.
Study Highlights Increased Risks: A pivotal study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association has brought attention to the potential dangers of regular cannabis consumption. The research indicates that daily users may face a 25% higher likelihood of experiencing a heart attack and a 42% increased risk of stroke compared to non-users. This study analysed data from over 434,000 respondents between 2016 to 2020, revealing a striking correlation between frequent cannabis use and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
- Details
- Hits: 739
The growing prevalence of cannabis use for both recreational and medical purposes has brought increased scrutiny to its potential side effects, particularly concerning sleep and memory. Recent research has revealed intriguing connections between long-term cannabis use, sleep disturbances, and memory issues.
One of the critical insights from the research is the apparent contradiction between the common use of cannabis as a sleep aid and its observed impact on sleep quality. Lead author Tracy Brown emphasised that despite being a primary motive for cannabis use, long-term consumption actually correlates with poorer sleep, which in turn affects memory. These findings suggest that consumers, clinicians, and policymakers should carefully consider the therapeutic use of cannabis, particularly its application as a remedy for sleep issues.
- Details
- Hits: 604
Australia’s medicinal cannabis industry, once touted as the miracle cure for everything from stubbed toes to existential dread, is now revealing its true colours – and they’re not so green and wholesome after all. Recent investigations have peeled back the tie-dye curtain to expose a cesspool of dubious practices, gaping regulatory black holes, and a cavalier attitude towards patient safety that would make even the most hardened snake oil peddler blush.
This “wonder drug,” championed by hipsters and desperate patients alike, was supposed to be the panacea of the 21st century. Instead, it’s shaping up to be nothing more than a cash grab, with profit-hungry vultures circling vulnerable patients like moths to a flame – or should we say, stoners to a dispensary. As accusations of reckless prescribing and marketing tactics fly, one can’t help but wonder: Is this the second coming of reefer madness, now with a shiny “medical” label slapped on for good measure?
The Dispensed Controversy: A Tale of Two Tragedies
At the heart of the controversy are telehealth platforms and clinics specialising in medicinal cannabis prescriptions. These businesses, operating in a regulatory grey area, have led to an explosion in cannabis prescribing, raising alarm bells among medical professionals and regulatory bodies alike.
(For complete story WRD News)
- Details
- Hits: 665
As cannabis legalisation expands across the United States, understanding the impact of cannabis smoke on indoor air quality has become increasingly important. A recent study published in Atmospheric Environment: X delves into the concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5), emission rates, and decay rates resulting from cannabis use in a residential setting. This study provides critical insights into how different methods of cannabis consumption compare to traditional tobacco cigarettes in terms of indoor air pollution.
Study Methodology: The study involved 60 controlled experiments conducted in a 43 m³ room. Researchers measured PM2.5 concentrations using real-time monitors specifically designed for this purpose. The experiments focused on four methods of cannabis consumption: pre-rolled marijuana joints, bongs, glass pipes, and electronic vaping pens. For comparative purposes, emissions from Marlboro cigarettes were also measured. An experienced smoker followed a standardised puffing protocol across all experiments to ensure consistency.
Key Findings: The findings revealed significant differences in PM2.5 emission rates among the various cannabis consumption methods and compared to tobacco smoke:
- Cannabis Joints: These produced the highest indoor PM2.5 concentrations and had the largest emission rates. The average emission rate for the joints was 7.8 mg/min, which is 3.5 times higher than that of Marlboro cigarettes (2.2 mg/min).
- Cannabis Bongs: The emission rate was approximately 67% that of the joint, indicating a substantial but lesser contribution to indoor PM2.5 levels.
- Glass Pipes: These devices had emission rates at 54% of the joint’s rate, highlighting a moderate impact on indoor air quality.
- Vaping Pens: Interestingly, this method resulted in the lowest emission rates (44% of the joint’s rate). However, the decay rate of PM2.5 from vaping pens was higher than that of other cannabis sources, suggesting quicker dissipation of particles.
Each consumption method’s emission rates were statistically significant compared to the joints, illustrating distinct profiles in terms of indoor pollution.
Implications for Indoor Air Quality: The study underscores the significant impact of cannabis smoking on indoor air quality, particularly from joints and bongs, which produce higher PM2.5 levels than tobacco cigarettes. This insight is crucial for public health, especially in jurisdictions where cannabis use is prevalent.
Given the health risks associated with PM2.5 exposure, such as respiratory and cardiovascular issues, these findings highlight the need for effective ventilation strategies and public awareness to mitigate indoor air pollution from cannabis smoke.
Study Limitations and Future Research: While the study provides valuable data on PM2.5 emissions, it is limited by its focus on a single residential setting. Further research should explore a broader range of environments and consider additional factors like room size, ventilation rates, and varying user behaviours that may influence particle concentrations.
Future studies could also investigate the long-term health impacts of exposure to cannabis-derived PM2.5 and explore mitigation strategies to reduce indoor air pollution. (Source: Science Direct)
Also see Is Your Rental Property Toxic – Residential Drug Use & Need for Protective Legislation.